Skip to content

Empirically evaluates QBA for outcome phenotype error correction in several pharmacoepidemiologic comparative effect estimation scenarios. Simulates an analytic space defined by outcome incidence proportions, observed effect estimates, and phenotype measurement errors to determine which QBA input combinations produce valid results.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

ohdsi-studies/QbaEvaluation

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

20 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Quantitative bias analysis for outcome phenotype error correction in comparative effect estimation: an empirical and synthetic evaluation

Study Status: Results Available

  • Analytics use case(s): Population-Level Estimation
  • Study type: Methods Research
  • Tags: QBA
  • Study lead: James Weaver
  • Study lead forums tag: jweave17
  • Study start date: 1 January 2022
  • Study end date: -
  • Protocol: Protocol
  • Publications: TODO
  • Results explorer: Explorer

This study empirically evaluates QBA for outcome phenotype error correction in several pharmacoepidemiologic comparative effect estimation scenarios. It also simulates an analytic space defined by outcome incidence proportions, observed effect estimates, and phenotype measurement errors to determine which QBA input combinations produce valid results.

About

Empirically evaluates QBA for outcome phenotype error correction in several pharmacoepidemiologic comparative effect estimation scenarios. Simulates an analytic space defined by outcome incidence proportions, observed effect estimates, and phenotype measurement errors to determine which QBA input combinations produce valid results.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published