Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: As a user, I want to include the request body in the opa-input, so that I can reason about its contents #11629

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: As a user, I want to include the request body in the opa-input, so that I can reason about its contents #11629

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

wistefan
Copy link

@wistefan wistefan commented Oct 8, 2024

Description

In order to make decisions based on the request body, the OPA-Plugin will also forward the body when configured to do so.

Fixes #11387

Checklist

  • I have explained the need for this PR and the problem it solves
  • I have explained the changes or the new features added to this PR
  • I have added tests corresponding to this change
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect this change
  • I have verified that this change is backward compatible (If not, please discuss on the APISIX mailing list first)

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. doc Documentation things enhancement New feature or request labels Oct 8, 2024
@wistefan wistefan mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
doc Documentation things enhancement New feature or request size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: As a user, I want to include the request body in the opa-input, so that I can reason about its contents
1 participant
@wistefan