Update deploy example to use snowcli 2.0 #58
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
| definition_version: 1 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what is this used for? should it always be 1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it's always 1 currently. The idea (which is fairly common in other config files) is that if you change the spec in a non-backwards-compatible way, you can change the definition version so the user and the parser knows which one to use. I can definitely add a comment on this, though.
| from snowflake.snowpark.functions import count_distinct | ||
| from utils import ( | ||
| from common.utils import ( |
| main_file: streamlit_app.py | ||
| env_file: environment.yml | ||
| pages_dir: pages/ | ||
| additional_source_files: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe we can add a comment that is like "this grabs all the python files in the common folder"
| @@ -242,76 +241,6 @@ def format_sql_from_df(df: DataFrame, use_header: bool = True) -> str: | |||
| return header + format_sql(str(df._plan.queries[0].sql)) | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| @st.cache_data | |||
| - snowflake | ||
| dependencies: | ||
| - python=3.8.13 # The latest python available in snowflake as of 2024-02-12 | ||
| - streamlit=1.26.0 # The latest streamlit available in snowflake as of 2024-02-12 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so streamlit is 1.22 in SiS for most customers right now, we should be going into a public preview next week so I think this is fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, good catch. Should I update the comment to reflect the date, or is this fine as-is?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nah it is fine as is I think
|
@iamontheinet wdyt? |
No description provided.