sf 2.61.8 (new formula)

[catalandres]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

[catalandres]

There exists a cask for the same tool.

Salesforce provides two paths to installation: a binary and an NPM package. The binary comes packaged with its own version of Node, which is extremely inefficient and redundant for Brew users. brew install sf should install the NPM package, and users should have the option to install the complete binary with brew install sf --cask.

[github-actions]

Thanks for contributing to Homebrew! 🎉 It looks like you're having trouble with a CI failure. See our contribution guide for help. You may be most interested in the section on dealing with CI failures. You can find the CI logs in the Checks tab of your pull request.

[chenrui333]

lgtm, thanks!

[stefanb]

btw, you don't have to rebase it unless you need to resolve a conflict

[catalandres]

Understood — newb here: long time listerner, first time caller 🙂